[Live-demo] Translations and Proj4 documentation
Cameron Shorter
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Tue Jun 20 13:45:50 PDT 2017
Hi Julien,
In case you missed it, I've reviewed your Proj4 Project Overview, pull
request is here:
https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/pull/216
Thanks for your work.
On 17/6/17 7:19 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
>
>
> >> Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in
> hospital, so she will be short on spare time for a bit.
>
> Thank you for telling me. I am sure she'd be back soon.
>
>
> >> I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this
> weekend, from a readability point of view.
>
> I'm done with proj4 on my side : doc & iso 10.5 are good for me.
> I am about to pull request it.
>
> It would have been done whatever the release it is for. It wasn't so
> much work to do.
>
> Regards,
> Julien.
>
> 2017-06-16 22:22 GMT+02:00 Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com
> <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>>:
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> Vicky has mentioned that she is helping her brother who is in
> hospital, so she will be short on spare time for a bit.
>
> I hope to have a chance to review your proj4 doc updates this
> weekend, from a readability point of view.
>
> Warm regards, Cameron
>
>
> On 16/6/17 7:15 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>> Hi Vicky,
>>
>> I am downloading the 10.5 iso in order to make the test.
>>
>> I had a look to pgRouting's quickstart, and made a very few
>> change : are you agree to be proj4's quickstart's reviewer ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Julien.
>>
>> 2017-06-14 20:29 GMT+02:00 Julien Moquet <moquet.julien at gmail.com
>> <mailto:moquet.julien at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Hi Vicky,
>>
>> I am not in the incubating list as a human being, but metacrs
>> is :
>> http://www.osgeo.org/incubator
>>
>>
>> I'll have a look on pgRouting.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Julien.
>>
>>
>> 2017-06-14 3:02 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de
>> <mailto:vicky at georepublic.de>>:
>>
>> Hello Julien,
>>
>> Now about the documentation
>> I see you've worked on your fork, these are the differences:
>> is that correct?
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master
>> <https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master>
>>
>> I dont think you are incubating project (I dont see it in
>> the list of incubating projects), so this might not apply.
>>
>> .. image:: ../../images/logos/OSGeo_incubation.png
>> :scale: 100 %
>> :alt: OSGeo Project
>> :align: right
>> :target:http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html
>> <http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html>
>>
>>
>> But I see you advanced a lot on the documentation 👍
>> You might as well do the PR so that the other members of
>> the team can give you feed back.
>> Vicky.
>>
>> PS, in pgRouting the documentation is done in such a
>> way, to make minimal changes in further releases of OSGeo
>> Live.
>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Julien Moquet
>> <moquet.julien at gmail.com
>> <mailto:moquet.julien at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Vicky,
>> My fork is up to date regarding the overview and
>> quickstart:
>> https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc
>> <https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc>
>> Before making a pull request, I need to test it over
>> the OsGeoLive-10.5 (on wednesday or thursday).
>> Although, as I read the sources.list include in this
>> version, I don't really think the latest proj4 will
>> be used.
>> The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the
>> stable 4.8.0-3 proj4 release to be used. See :
>> http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/
>> <http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu/pool/main/p/proj/>
>>
>> and
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list
>> <https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sources.list.d/ubuntugis.list>
>>
>> That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4
>> release on its overview.
>> I only bypass the metacrs and stuff.
>> Regards,
>> Julien.
>> 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara
>> <vicky at georepublic.de <mailto:vicky at georepublic.de>>:
>>
>> Hi Julien, et all
>> Maybe you can help me.
>> It so happened that I sent another mail asking
>> about what version to use, while reviewing today,
>> I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4.
>> (my mail merge skills are not so good)
>> So, here is the hand made mail:
>> Hi all, With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot,
>> we will be re-inserting each project into the
>> OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each
>> project has replied to confirm that they have
>> reviewed docs and verified the application works
>> as expected. Can you please: 0. Reply by return
>> email to confirm that you have recieved this
>> email and that you are able to check docs within
>> the next 2 weeks. (sooner would be better if you
>> can) 1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is
>> still accurate, or has been updated, (and version
>> numbers are correct) 2. Reply to confirm you
>> have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the
>> previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the
>> quickstart where needed. We understand that
>> version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on
>> OSGeo-Live 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on
>> OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
>> (all in one reply is ok)
>> Full package status can be seen here:
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMlM8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150>
>> Key Milestones ------------------- 18-Jun-2017
>> All docs reviewed and verified 21-Jun-2017
>> OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application
>> versions installed - Beta stage) 24-Jul-2017
>> OSGeo-Live Final ISO 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017
>> Boston ... full schedule
>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
>> <http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter
>> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com
>> <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Julien,
>>
>> Thanks for offering to help with
>> translations. I'm looping in Niko and Vicky
>> who are currently wrestling with trying to
>> get transifex to work. If you are familiar
>> with it, you might be able to help them.
>>
>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>
>> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been
>>> translated into other languages, including
>>> proj4js, ..." > Agreed that metacrs is
>>> probably a bit too ..
>>> I am fully agree too.
>>> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages,
>>> I can help on the proj4 French Translation
>>> pages.
>>> Regards,
>>> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault
>>> <even.rouault at spatialys.com
>>> <mailto:even.rouault at spatialys.com>>:
>>>
>>> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST
>>> Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Evan,
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering
>>> all the Proj4 projects together.
>>>
>>> > However, it appears that proj4 is the
>>> only project in that grouping
>>>
>>> > which is active?
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS"
>>> should be dropped from OSGeo-Live
>>>
>>> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used
>>> instead. It would be ok to say "Proj4
>>>
>>> > has been translated into other
>>> languages, including proj4js, ..."
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > Your thoughts are welcome.
>>>
>>> Regarding what is listed currently in
>>> metacrs :
>>>
>>> - proj4js: no opinion
>>>
>>> - cs-map: no-opinion
>>>
>>> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used
>>> underneath by GDAL in particular, mostly
>>> in maintaince mode, but can be treated
>>> as a technical dependency that doesn't
>>> require to be visible from users.
>>>
>>> - proj4j: no opinion
>>>
>>> - spatialreference.org
>>> <http://spatialreference.org>: not
>>> maintained in years. http://epsg.io/
>>> would be a possible replacement
>>>
>>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit
>>> too ... meta for folks exploring
>>> OSGeo-Live content, so it could make
>>> sense exposing proj.4 as a standalone
>>> project.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>>>
>>> http://www.spatialys.com
>>>
>> --
>> Cameron Shorter
>> M+61 419 142 254 <tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>> 81739 München, Germany
>>
>> Vicky Vergara
>> Operations Research
>>
>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de>
>> Web:https://georepublic.info
>>
>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>> --
>>
>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>> 81739 München, Germany
>>
>> Vicky Vergara
>> Operations Research
>>
>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de>
>> Web:https://georepublic.info
>>
>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Live-demo mailing list
>> Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org>
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
>> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo>
>> http://live.osgeo.org
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>> <http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc>
>
> --
> Cameron Shorter
> M+61 419 142 254 <tel:+61%20419%20142%20254>
>
--
Cameron Shorter
M +61 419 142 254
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20170621/32504168/attachment.html>
More information about the Osgeolive
mailing list