[OWSLib-devel] github migration

Tom Kralidis tomkralidis at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 20 15:16:22 PDT 2012



Jachym: thanks for the explanation.  +1 for me.

..Tom


----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:10:50 +0200
> From: jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
> To: tomkralidis at hotmail.com
> CC: owslib-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OWSLib-devel] github migration
>
> IMHO that is question of if the level of transparency vs. speed.
>
> It would be mayebe cleaner, if core commiters would make pull requests
> as well. Github can then visualize the approach of each person in very
> nice way
>
> https://github.com/openlayers/openlayers/graphs
>
> Maybe even cross-checking of the code would be nice as well, but IMHO
> there are not so many developers around the project (test should be
> enough).
>
> So basic approach for core commiters would be
>
> 1 - fork
> 2 - changes
> 3 - pull request
> 4 - (wait till somebody review it, if nobody would (usual case)), accept
> your own pull request
>
> j
>
> Dne 20.6.2012 23:33, Tom Kralidis napsal(a):
> >
> >
> > Jachym: I'm +1 with this approach.
> >
> > So the OWSLib is our core committer list. What happens when one of us makes a change/feature/fix/etc.? Do we fork and branch and do pull request? Do we just commit straight to the repo?
> >
> > ..Tom
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:24:48 +0200
> >> From: jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
> >> To: tomkralidis at hotmail.com
> >> CC: owslib-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >> Subject: Re: [OWSLib-devel] github migration
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have to say, that after some time, I really like the openlayers-github
> >> approach:
> >>
> >> 1) each developer creates fork of the master branch of the source
> >> 2) after chnages are done, deloper asks for pull request
> >> 3) discussion happens. once the code is polished, pull request is
> >> accepted by the core-committer
> >>
> >> detailed description here https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo
> >>
> >> Example of such process:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/openlayers/openlayers/pull/523
> >>
> >> Works nice
> >>
> >> +1 for such approach
> >>
> >> Jachym
> >>
> >> P.S. Sorry, if this was clear to everybody and everybody is fine with that.
> >>
> >> Dne 20.6.2012 23:15, Tom Kralidis napsal(a):
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Devs: FYI I've ported the svn repo (with tags/branches) to github:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/geopython/OWSLib
> >>>
> >>> I've made a geopython organization, under which is an OWSLib team, which all committers to OWSLib are part of. If you are a committer are not a part of this team, please let me know. I'm also in the midst of porting the trac tickets to github as well.
> >>>
> >>> Dom: FYI I need a github username from yourself to add to the team.
> >>>
> >>> Can folks take a look at the new git repo and ensure everything is ok? I'd like, by next week, to make this the official repo and issue tracker, and update the codebase docs/etc. to reflect this.
> >>>
> >>> Do folks think this should warrant a 0.5.1 release? This would update our docs/etc. on pypi as well.
> >>>
> >>> If possible, please refrain from commits to svn and work off github.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> ..Tom
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> OWSLib-devel mailing list
> >>> OWSLib-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/owslib-devel
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jachym Cepicky
> >> Help Service - Remote Sensing s.r.o.
> >> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
> >> HS-RS: jachym at hsrs.cz http://bnhelp.cz
> >> http://les-ejk.cz
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Jachym Cepicky
> Help Service - Remote Sensing s.r.o.
> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
> HS-RS: jachym at hsrs.cz http://bnhelp.cz
> http://les-ejk.cz
>
 		 	   		  


More information about the OWSLib-devel mailing list