[pdal] Boost version

[Michael P. Gerlek]

Hmm.  Well, I'd certainly prefer not to track more than one boost version,
so I'm happy with that.

But -- I assume because of boost stuff -- the filesystem tests are failing
on windows with the current boost, and I assume on the old boost too.
Assuming the fixes aren't the same for both, you don't want to the do
windows stuff do you?  Or are we okay ignoring the fails (dangerous, but
appealing)?

-mpg



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howard Butler [mailto:hobu.inc at gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 9:18 AM
> To: <mpg at flaxen.com>
> Cc: <pdal at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [pdal] Boost version
> 
> You don't have to run 1.41 as your baseline. I'll keep the task of
backporting
> stuff as necessary for 1.41 compatibility. In fact, it's probably better
for us to
> run current stuff.
> 
> On Sep 10, 2011, at 11:14 AM, "Michael P. Gerlek" <mpg at flaxen.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > OK, I'm going to try and install 1.41 and see if I can get a windows
build.
> >
> > -mpg
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Howard Butler [mailto:hobu.inc at gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 9:13 AM
> >> To: mpg at flaxen.com
> >> Cc: <pdal at lists.osgeo.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [pdal] Boost version
> >>
> >> I got it back to 1.41, but forgot to update CMakeLists.txt to reflect
that
> > yet.
> >>
> >> On Sep 10, 2011, at 11:05 AM, "Michael P. Gerlek" <mpg at flaxen.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Which version is the baseline now, 1.41 or 1.42?
> >>>
> >>> -mpg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> pdal mailing list
> >>> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
> >