[pdal] Boost version

[Howard Butler]

Assuming 1.46+ for windows would be fine for me. I just need the Linux distribution coverage for the older versions. 

On Sep 10, 2011, at 11:22 AM, "Michael P. Gerlek" <mpg at flaxen.com> wrote:

> Hmm.  Well, I'd certainly prefer not to track more than one boost version,
> so I'm happy with that.
> 
> But -- I assume because of boost stuff -- the filesystem tests are failing
> on windows with the current boost, and I assume on the old boost too.
> Assuming the fixes aren't the same for both, you don't want to the do
> windows stuff do you?  Or are we okay ignoring the fails (dangerous, but
> appealing)?
> 
> -mpg
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Howard Butler [mailto:hobu.inc at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 9:18 AM
>> To: <mpg at flaxen.com>
>> Cc: <pdal at lists.osgeo.org>
>> Subject: Re: [pdal] Boost version
>> 
>> You don't have to run 1.41 as your baseline. I'll keep the task of
> backporting
>> stuff as necessary for 1.41 compatibility. In fact, it's probably better
> for us to
>> run current stuff.
>> 
>> On Sep 10, 2011, at 11:14 AM, "Michael P. Gerlek" <mpg at flaxen.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> OK, I'm going to try and install 1.41 and see if I can get a windows
> build.
>>> 
>>> -mpg
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Howard Butler [mailto:hobu.inc at gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2011 9:13 AM
>>>> To: mpg at flaxen.com
>>>> Cc: <pdal at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [pdal] Boost version
>>>> 
>>>> I got it back to 1.41, but forgot to update CMakeLists.txt to reflect
> that
>>> yet.
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 10, 2011, at 11:05 AM, "Michael P. Gerlek" <mpg at flaxen.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Which version is the baseline now, 1.41 or 1.42?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -mpg
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> pdal mailing list
>>>>> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
>>> 
>