[pdal] Proposal: Remove SQLite reader/writer for PDAL 2.0

Howard Butler howard at hobu.co
Thu Aug 1 12:26:34 PDT 2019



> On Aug 1, 2019, at 2:09 PM, Jed Frechette <jedfrechette at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 12:32 PM Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:
>> I think TileDB is a better choice for this task at the moment than SQLite with the upcoming PDAL 2.0 release. Norman Barker is supporting it through PDAL's support venues, and I believe his firm is available for paid support opportunities. It is going to perform much better and it supports streaming. The SQLite drivers were a proof of concept that I developed based on our experience with both the Oracle and pgpointcloud drivers, and while it is interesting for database storage of point clouds, it has some significant downsides.
> 
> Thanks for the good advice. I had looked in to TileDB and it seems
> really interesting but given how general it is I wasn't sure how well
> the implementation played with PDAL. It's good to hear that it is at
> least a candidate for a nativeish container format.

Numpy is also a candidate. We don't have a writers.numpy, but all the code to do so is in the Python extension. You could then save npz files and transit your data that way. Happy to merge a patch on it, but it won't make the 2.0 release cutoff.

Howard


More information about the pdal mailing list