[pdal] New filters.lloydkmeans

Miguel Guerrero g.miguel.guerrero.m at gmail.com
Mon Sep 14 13:15:33 PDT 2020


Thanks, I'll check it out.

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:12 PM Bradley Chambers <brad.chambers at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Actually, after taking a closer look, I think you've uncovered a recently
> introduced bug. I've created a ticket if you'd like to track (
> https://github.com/PDAL/PDAL/issues/3240).
>
> Brad
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:35 PM Bradley Chambers <brad.chambers at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Miguel,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:49 PM Miguel Guerrero <
>> g.miguel.guerrero.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Question, is this filter available in Python-PDAL?
>>>
>>
>> It should be, but if you find otherwise, you can create an issue on
>> GitHub.
>>
>>
>>> What would be the best practice to use this segmentation filter?
>>>
>>
>> It is going to depend on the nature of your data and what you are trying
>> to accomplish. The defaults/examples are not necessarily indicative of
>> "good" values as you have found.
>>
>> Brad
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pdal/attachments/20200914/7f1db57d/attachment.html>


More information about the pdal mailing list