[pdal] Kernel deprecation?

[Adam Steer]

Hey Howard

Good question. I tend to head for pipelines and python also. So my
vote is "do what is easiest for the PDAL team to maintain". If that
means deprecating the listed kernels, +1 from me. I've never used them
in practice or in training.

Cheers

Adam

--
Dr Adam Steer
https://iamadamsteer.com


On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 04:17, Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:
>
> I was wondering what the PDAL user community thinks about some of the PDAL kernels. For a lot of these capabilities, I find myself using simple pipelines or writing more complex logic using the new Python bindings. It is my hypothesis that many of you are doing the same. Specifically, are they being used? If so, what makes them successful for you (or not).
>
> * chamfer
> * delta
> * density
> * eval
> * ground
> * hausdorff
> * random
>
> If we were to deprecate all of these in the upcoming PDAL 2.6.0 and removed them at PDAL 2.7.0, would you miss them? Which one(s) would you miss in your workflows?
>
> Howard
> _______________________________________________
> pdal mailing list
> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal