[pdal] las to geotif
Javier Jimenez Shaw
j1 at jimenezshaw.com
Sat Jun 8 11:39:29 PDT 2024
I have seen point clouds in WGS84, and GeoTIFFs also in WGS84. Does it mean
that a point cloud in geographic coordinates is conceptually wrong? I find
it strange, but is it wrong? Why does PDAL care?
On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 at 03:17, Sergey Yefimov via pdal <pdal at lists.osgeo.org>
wrote:
> It helps. Thank you very much.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Adam Steer <adam.d.steer at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, June 7, 2024 7:22 PM
> *To:* Sergey Yefimov <syefimov at ptfs.com>
> *Cc:* pdal at lists.osgeo.org <pdal at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [pdal] las to geotif
>
> THIS EMAIL IS FROM AN * UNTRUSTED* EMAIL PROVIDER.
>
> Hi Sergey - try reprojecting your source las file into a projected (in
> metres) system and running again.
>
> PDAL/GDAL pass projections through. Your input data are in degrees, your
> output resolution is interpreted as the same unit, so resolution 1.0 is
> interpreted as '1 degree'.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Adam
>
> --
> Dr Adam Steer
> https://spatialised.net
> Available for consulting/open for headhunting
>
> On Sat, Jun 8, 2024, 07:33 Sergey Yefimov via pdal <pdal at lists.osgeo.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I try to convert las to geotiff using this pipeline
>
> "pipeline":[
> {"type" : "readers.las",
> "filename":"C:\\KVData\\source\\las\\test.las"
> },
> {
> "type":"writers.gdal",
> "filename":"C:/KVData/source/tiff/ttest.tif",
> "resolution":1.0,
> "output_type":"all",
> "gdaldriver":"GTiff"
> }
> ]
>
> After conversion invalid 2 KB tiff file created. las info:
>
> {
> "file_size": 137422487,
> "filename": "C:\\KVData\\source\\las\\test.las",
> "now": "2024-06-07T17:09:19-0400",
> "pdal_version": "2.7.1 (git-version: Release)",
> "reader": "readers.las",
> "stats":
> {
> "bbox":
> {
> "EPSG:4326":
> {
> "bbox":
> {
> "maxx": -75.606374,
> "maxy": 35.9592838,
> "maxz": 29.71,
> "minx": -75.6350255,
> "miny": 35.942234,
> "minz": -11.88
> },
> "boundary": { "type": "Polygon", "coordinates": [ [ [ -75.6350255,
> 35.942234, -11.88 ], [ -75.6350255, 35.9592838, -11.88 ], [ -75.606374,
> 35.9592838, 29.71 ], [ -75.606374, 35.942234, 29.71 ], [ -75.6350255,
> 35.942234, -11.88 ] ] ] }
> }, ..
> "statistic":
> [
> {
> "average": -75.62226764,
> "count": 4907929,
> "maximum": -75.606374,
> "minimum": -75.6350255,
> "name": "X",
> "position": 0,
> "stddev": 0.005315505055,
> "variance": 2.825459399e-05
> },
> {
> "average": 35.95136764,
> "count": 4907929,
> "maximum": 35.9592838,
> "minimum": 35.942234,
> "name": "Y",
> "position": 1,
> "stddev": 0.002706953159,
> "variance": 7.327595404e-06
> },..
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> *|** P **|** T **|** F **|** S **|*
>
> Empowering Content
>
> 1801 Research Blvd
>
> Suite 310
>
> Rockville, MD 20850
>
> 301 654 8088 Ext 131
>
> www.ptfs.com
>
> syefimov at ptfs.com <udoh at ptfs.com>
> _______________________________________________
> pdal mailing list
> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
>
> _______________________________________________
> pdal mailing list
> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pdal/attachments/20240608/f726709f/attachment.htm>
More information about the pdal
mailing list