[pgrouting-dev] [pgr_2.0] Just checked in code to eliminate GAUL

[Paragon Corporation]

Just a heads up. We plan to distribute pgRouting binaries with PostGIS
builds moving forward.  Steve has been helping us a lot with that effort as
you can see.
 
We'll also be setting up the PostGIS windows build bot in the next couple of
weeks to autocompile/regress test whenever changes in the pgRouting code
base.
 
We have the pgRouting32 build up:
 
http://winnie.postgis.net/download/windows/pg92/buildbot/
 
 
Having some issue rebuilding the 64-bit, which we'll write up in a separate
post.
 
Thanks,
Regina and Leo
http://www.postgis.us
http://postgis.net
 

  _____  

From: pgrouting-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:pgrouting-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Pieter du Plooy
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:16 AM
To: pgRouting developers mailing list
Subject: Re: [pgrouting-dev] [pgr_2.0] Just checked in code to eliminate
GAUL


Thanx Steve


Do you perhaps have prebuilt binaries? (64 and 32 bit)?


I will build during this week, just need to get my DEV machine up and
running.





On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
wrote:


I built this based on the postgis mingw32 and ming64 build environments. But
if you pull my branch there is a tools directory at the top level that has
some scripts (more as doc then a runnable script) called:

makedependanciesw64.sh  - how to build the dependencies
makepgroutingw32.sh          - how to build under ming32
makepgroutingw64.sh          - how to build under ming64

I say to look at these as docs not as scripts because they have a lot of
assumptions about directory structures and such.

There are also a couple of patch files in the tools directory also. With my
latest checking you do not need to build the GAUL dependency anymore.

-Steve 


On 4/5/2013 1:09 AM, Pieter du Plooy wrote:


Steve


Is the windows build instructions the same as what I did last year for the
build that I made? (mingw?)


Pieter



On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
wrote:


Hi All,

I have just checked in code into sew-devel-2_0 branch that eliminates the
GAUL dependency and replaces the TSP solver with a simple C routine. I
rewrote the TSP lib code to use the existing GAUL API and to use the
postgresql memory management and added two test cases. I have build and
tested on Win32-pg92 and Linux-pg84 with no problems.

Daniel - Thanks for the feedback on TSP, I will look at it and see what I
can do with your suggestions.

The current code assumes a loop, ie: the start is also the end point. Other
than that is should work as before.

-Steve
_______________________________________________
pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev




 

_______________________________________________

pgrouting-dev mailing list

pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org

http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev



_______________________________________________
pgrouting-dev mailing list
pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20130406/28f56c0b/attachment.html>