[pgrouting-dev] Quick 2.0 Update

[Dave Potts]

On 07/03/13 06:40, Daniel Kastl wrote:
Hi

Is there any chance of including a 'test' database with this release?

It could be used as a example to show that you have installed pg routing 
correctly, it would also ensure known set of test cases exists from 
every different method of generatinga route.

Dave.
>
>     OK, that is great. I'm happy with the progress so far and I hope
>     to make good progress on getting cmake to pull everything into an
>     extension. Once that happens, can turn my focus the actual code.
>
>     I also noticed that the CMake site as a CTest package. I have not
>     looked at it but I'm wondering if it might not be good for
>     building our test infrastructure with. Have anyone looked at this?
>
>     http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake#CTest
>
>     While it is important that we do something with respect to
>     testing, I do not want to jump in without looking into what
>     postgis and mapserver projects are already doing.
>
>
> I think it's good to look what related projects do. And maybe they can 
> tell, why they choose this tool and not another one.
> Or maybe they can say if they are happy with their decision.
>
> Once I looked for some extensions I found pgTAP, which could be also 
> interesting: http://pgtap.org/
> I have no preference so far. With past decisions it was usually good 
> to look at what other OSGeo projects do.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> -- 
> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de <mailto:daniel.kastl at georepublic.de>
> Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pgrouting-dev mailing list
> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20130307/8bd4133c/attachment-0001.html>