[pgrouting-dev] PostGIS 2.1, Postgresql 9.3 and pgRouting - We need a plan!

[Daniel Kastl]

On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com
> wrote:

> Daniel, et al,
>
> PostGIS 2.1 is hitting feature freeze to sync up with
> PostgreSQL 9.3 which is going to Beta
>
> And we need to be able to support PostGIS being able to package a
> pgRouting on Windows with PostGIS 2.1. I already have pgrouting build in
> the postgis build bot, so the focus should be on the code and sql fixes as
> I outline below.
>
> So I think we need a plan for this, and some people effort would be good
> also.
>
> It seems to me that we need someone to:
>
> Setup an environment with pg 9.3 beta, postgis 2.1 trunk and take our
> pgrouting master and make changes required to make it work in that
> environment and package up a release.
>
> This should not include any new features.
> It should include ST_ fixes that we have a pull request for
> It should include some of the bug fixes that we have pull requests for
> It must include any additional compatibility changes.
> It must include some basic testing (we can pull the tests from my 2.0
> branch to make things simple)
>
> This would be called version 1.06
>
> This needs to happen after we move the branches around, which I hope to
> get to on Sunday.
>
> Anyone available to manage this release and tackle the items above?
> Anyone able to fund this at any level?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Steve
> ______________________________**_________________
> pgrouting-dev mailing list
> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev>
>


Hi Steve,

"PostGIS 2.1, Postgresql 9.3 and pgRouting" ... this is particularly for
Windows builds, isn't it?
Unfortunately on Windows I have close to zero experience.

I don't know how much time would be still available, but wouldn't it be
possible (and less work) to use the new 2.0 version instead of trying
another 1.06 release?
Pulling changes from here and there might cause new issues and then we had
to work on two releases at the same time. Otherwise we could just focus on
one.

Daniel



-- 
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
Web: http://georepublic.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20130504/086c8140/attachment.html>