[pgrouting-dev] MOTION 1

[Vicky Vergara]

Hi all
I added this mail thread to the MOTION so comments can be done here
Regards
Vicky

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:08 AM Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:

> I think using wiki for RFC is pretty standard for projects.
>
> If it is an issue, it gets lost with the other issues and this particular
> motion will probably comprise more than one issue when it’s all done.
>
> Here is an example of how GDAL does there’s -
> https://gdal.org/development/rfc/index.html
>
>
>
> In terms of MOTION vs. RFC.  I think RFC implies something more permanent
> in a project like a change in Protocol or change in disk format whereas
> Motion implies something lighter weight but that still requires PSC vote
> such as to make a new release in X days.  Motions are often just done in
> public email list without any dedicated page.
>
>
>
> It’s hard to say where this one falls and I’m not sure the subtlety is
> worth the hassle, so maybe call it an RFC.
>
>
>
> Like for example this one GDAL has -
> https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc38_ogr_faster_open.html  (seems
> closest to what we are doing here in terms of future implications) except
> we are mixing in, change in future logic, as well as request to release
> said logic soon.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Regina
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Daniel Kastl [mailto:daniel at georepublic.de]
> *Sent:* Monday, June 1, 2020 8:59 PM
> *To:* Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>
> *Cc:* pgRouting developers mailing list <pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org>;
> Cayetano Benavent <cayetano at cartodb.com>; Rohith Reddy <
> rohithreddy2219 at gmail.com>; Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us>
> *Subject:* Re: MOTION 1
>
>
>
> Hi Vicky,
>
>
>
> Is the meaning of "MOTION" more or less equal to how other projects call
> it "RFC"?
>
>
>
> Another question is, if it's intentional to use a Wiki page for that,
> because it makes it impossible to discuss in comments.
>
> If there is no specific reason to use a Wiki, shall we make it an issue?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:25 AM Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
>
>
> As part of looking forward to have pgROuting be considered as an OSGeo
> project
>
> We are starting with the way to handle motions from PSC
>
>
>
> First motion is here
>
> https://github.com/pgRouting/admin/wiki/MOTION-1:-Speed-up-Release-3.1.0
>
>
>
> Members of PSC please edit your vote by Friday.
>
> Developers please you can comment on the motion using this mail thread.
>
> So that adding your comments on the motions get registered on this mail
> thread
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Vicky Vergara
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>
> Salzmannstraße 44,
>
> 81739 München, Germany
>
>
>
> Vicky Vergara
>
> Operations Research
>
>
>
> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>
> Web: https://georepublic.info
>
>
>
> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>
> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>
>
>
> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>
> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
> Web: https://georepublic.info
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 

Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Salzmannstraße 44,
81739 München, Germany

Vicky Vergara
Operations Research

eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
Web: https://georepublic.info

Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9

Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
CEO: Daniel Kastl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20200602/39d2671e/attachment.html>