[pgrouting-dev] MOTION 1

[Regina Obe]

I think using wiki for RFC is pretty standard for projects. 

If it is an issue, it gets lost with the other issues and this particular motion will probably comprise more than one issue when it’s all done.

Here is an example of how GDAL does there’s - https://gdal.org/development/rfc/index.html

 

In terms of MOTION vs. RFC.  I think RFC implies something more permanent in a project like a change in Protocol or change in disk format whereas Motion implies something lighter weight but that still requires PSC vote such as to make a new release in X days.  Motions are often just done in public email list without any dedicated page.  

 

It’s hard to say where this one falls and I’m not sure the subtlety is worth the hassle, so maybe call it an RFC.

 

Like for example this one GDAL has - https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc38_ogr_faster_open.html  (seems closest to what we are doing here in terms of future implications) except we are mixing in, change in future logic, as well as request to release said logic soon.

 

Thanks,

Regina

 

 

From: Daniel Kastl [mailto:daniel at georepublic.de] 
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 8:59 PM
To: Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>
Cc: pgRouting developers mailing list <pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org>; Cayetano Benavent <cayetano at cartodb.com>; Rohith Reddy <rohithreddy2219 at gmail.com>; Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us>
Subject: Re: MOTION 1

 

Hi Vicky,

 

Is the meaning of "MOTION" more or less equal to how other projects call it "RFC"?

 

Another question is, if it's intentional to use a Wiki page for that, because it makes it impossible to discuss in comments.

If there is no specific reason to use a Wiki, shall we make it an issue?

 

Best regards,

Daniel

 

 

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:25 AM Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de <mailto:vicky at georepublic.de> > wrote:

Hello all

 

As part of looking forward to have pgROuting be considered as an OSGeo project

We are starting with the way to handle motions from PSC

 

First motion is here

https://github.com/pgRouting/admin/wiki/MOTION-1:-Speed-up-Release-3.1.0

 

Members of PSC please edit your vote by Friday.

Developers please you can comment on the motion using this mail thread.

So that adding your comments on the motions get registered on this mail thread

 

Kind regards

Vicky Vergara

 


-- 

Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Salzmannstraße 44, 
81739 München, Germany
 
Vicky Vergara
Operations Research
 
eMail: vicky at georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de> 
Web: https://georepublic.info
 
Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
 
Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
CEO: Daniel Kastl
 




 

-- 

Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail:  <mailto:daniel.kastl at georepublic.de> daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
Web: https://georepublic.info

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20200602/da7a8d28/attachment-0001.html>