[pgrouting-dev] MOTION 2: Stop 2.x series support

[Daniel Kastl]

+0

I understand the reasons for dropping CGAL and I think it's a good idea to
lower the amount of maintenance effort.
This is just a single function that probably only has a few users and it
requires a lot of attention.
Because I and my company do not use the alphaShape function at the moment,
it's also easy to agree.

That said, I'm not really sure if alphaShape will be part of PostGIS any
time soon.
Is there someone working on this? Is there a feature request issue already?
If not, we should probably create an issue and reference it to the one on
pgRouting to drop CGAL.

Regards,
Daniel




On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 23:33, Cayetano Benavent <cayetano at carto.com> wrote:

> Hi Vicky,
>
> My vote is +1.
>
> Regards,
>
> El sáb., 3 oct. 2020 5:44, Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de> escribió:
>
>> Hello community
>>
>> I am making the following motion:
>> https://github.com/pgRouting/admin/wiki/MOTION-2:-Stop-2.x-series-support
>>
>> Please use this mail thread to make comments and your community vote.
>> PSC members please vote on the motion.
>>
>> Regards
>> Vicky
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>> 81739 München, Germany
>>
>> Vicky Vergara
>> Operations Research
>>
>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>
>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>>
>>

-- 
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
Web: https://georepublic.info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20201005/5edbdc3b/attachment.html>