[pgrouting-users] postgis 2.0 and postgresql 9.1
Sanak
geosanak at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 15:37:13 PDT 2012
Hi Pieter,
Current PostGIS 64 bit windows binary built with mingw 64,
and I think following build instruction was finally used.
http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/wiki/DevWikiWinMingW64
In case of pgRouting, remove PostGIS specific instruction(GDAL/GEOS/GTK+
.etc) from above site,
and add pgRouting specific instruction(Boost/CGAL(with GMP)/GAUL).
Currently, I think that pgRouting mingw 64 bit build will be spent 3-5
days,
while msvc 64 bit build will be spent 20-30 days,
because msvc approach needs full analyzation of Shooting Star(use Boost
Graph Library) algorithm,
and I have not enough knowledge about Boost Graph Library and C++ template
technique.
Regards,
2012/6/9 Pieter du Plooy <pjduplooy at zpanelcp.com>
> Hi Sanak
>
> Isn't Postgis for 64 bit windows built with mingw?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Sanak <geosanak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen Woodbridge, Organization Members,
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> I didn't noticed about "extension",
>> and release 2.0 really include lot of TODOs...
>>
>> So, if windows 64bit demand is large and in a hurry,
>> I will try mingw 64bit build at first for quick approach,
>> and later try msvc(Microsoft Visual Studio C++) 64bit build for release
>> 2.0.
>> (msvc approach will be require many source(.h/.c/.cpp) changes,
>> because of poor C99 support .etc, and it's no longer packaging issue.)
>>
>> mingw-diff : https://github.com/sanak/pgrouting/compare/master...mingw
>> msvc-diff : https://github.com/sanak/pgrouting/compare/master...msvc
>>
>> Windows msvc build advantages is as follows.
>> 1. PostgreSQL 8.4+ itself has been build with msvc8+.
>> 2. Process debbuging is possible. (see
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Windows
>> )
>> 3. More easier development and crash investigation.
>>
>> But, those advantages may be useful only Windows enterprise user or
>> developer.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> 2012/6/8 Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>
>>
>>> We currently do not have a plan for a release. In fact we do not have a
>>> developer that can do the release. I have spent a little bit of time trying
>>> to identify what needs to be done, but have had no time to work on it
>>> beyond the little bit of planning I have done.
>>>
>>> I would agree that 2.0 should be targeted at PostgreSQL 9.x and PostGIS
>>> 2.0+ which probably means we should look into the new postgresql
>>> CREATE EXTENSION pgrouting;
>>> system for installation.
>>>
>>> If any developer(s) would like to step up to this task or any of the
>>> release tasks, I'm willing to help out and share the effort and make sure
>>> we have come continuity of effort.
>>>
>>> And as Daniel commented funding or sponsorship could help. The TRSP
>>> routing was customer funded and the core code development was done under
>>> contract by Ashraf (aka: Roni) in Bangladesh, a former GSoC student.
>>>
>>> Or eventually, I will have to upgrade my systems to Postgresql 9+ and
>>> postGIS 2.0+ and be forced to figure this out in self-defense :)
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> -Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/7/2012 8:48 AM, Sanak wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Pieter, Recardo,
>>>> Thanks for quick response!
>>>> Hi Daniel, Organization Members,
>>>> Because PostGIS Windows 64 bit installer support only ver2.0+,
>>>> so it may be better that pgRouting Windows 64 bit binary support only
>>>> ver2.0+,
>>>> but, is there 2.0 release plan?
>>>> (I guess that 2.0 release include TRSP to core, Shooting Star to extra,
>>>> Unit test .etc)
>>>> And can I join release 2.0 development(mainly Windows 64 bit porting)?
>>>> 2012/6/7 Daniel Kastl <daniel at georepublic.de <mailto:
>>>> daniel at georepublic.de>**>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PS: You can contact Sanak directly or you can donate to pgRouting
>>>> project and we will forward the sponsorship to him.
>>>>
>>>> Latter is better for me, because I am not so good at English. (I always
>>>> use translation site)
>>>> And I hope that appropriate donation to pgRouting project exists.
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ricardo Bayley
>>>> <ricardo.bayley at gmail.com <mailto:ricardo.bayley at gmail.**com<ricardo.bayley at gmail.com>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> likewise
>>>> +1 for a pgrouting windows 64bit
>>>>
>>>> 2012/6/6 Pieter du Plooy <pjduplooy at zpanelcp.com
>>>> <mailto:pjduplooy at zpanelcp.com**>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi guys
>>>>
>>>> My first post here, and just to say +1 from me for a 64 bit
>>>> Windows build of pgrouting.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Pieter
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>>>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org<Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> <mailto:Pgrouting-users at lists.**osgeo.org<Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>>>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org<Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> <mailto:Pgrouting-users at lists.**osgeo.org<Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
>>>> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de <mailto:daniel.kastl@**
>>>> georepublic.de <daniel.kastl at georepublic.de>>
>>>> Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>>>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org><mailto:
>>>> Pgrouting-users at lists.**osgeo.org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>>>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pgrouting-users mailing list
> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-users/attachments/20120609/4ab5a385/attachment.html>
More information about the Pgrouting-users
mailing list