[postgis-devel] EWKB proposal for OGC
strk at refractions.net
strk at refractions.net
Wed Dec 29 00:12:50 PST 2004
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:45:09AM +0900, Paul Selormey wrote:
> Unfortunately, the 99-402r2 is not yet available to some of us
> the non-OGC members, and therefore commenting on these extensions
> may not be right.
Martin Daly sent that document as an attachent on this list:
http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-devel/2004-December/000695.html
> I have just these:
> 1. You have used "misure" in the documents, do you mean "measure"?
Yes, corrected.
> 2. I wish the presence of the SRID in the geometry WKT is a suffix, since
> it can be considered optional and should not break existing codes:
> "POINT(1 2);SRID=4326"
It *is* optional (meaning undefined SRID, -1 for postgis).
Would existing code work with POINTM(1 2 3) or POINT(1 2 3 4) ?
Also, EWKB will also probably break existing code, any existing
case of compatibility ?
> BTW, any plan to define WTK for triangle, rectangle, circle and other
> geometries defined in GML 3.x?
Not that I'm aware of.
--strk;
>
> Best regards,
> Paul.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <strk at refractions.net>
> To: "PostGIS Development Discussion" <postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net>
> Cc: "Paul Ramsey" <pramsey at refractions.net>
> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 9:01 PM
> Subject: [postgis-devel] EWKB proposal for OGC
>
>
> >As suggested by Martin Daly I've made a draft proposal for ZM and
> >SRID inclusion in WKB and WKT.
> >
> >Differently to the Z-Geometry proposal I did not specify semantic
> >of the M values, as I don't see any "standardizable" behaviour
> >for them. For example, M(isures) could represent temperature
> >(linear interpolation meaningful) as well as time (meaningless
> >linear interpolation).
> >
> >Draft attached, comments expected.
> >
> >--strk;
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> >_______________________________________________
> >postgis-devel mailing list
> >postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> >http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
--
For standing up against patentability of software,
Thank You, Poland!
Read the intervention: http://kwiki.ffii.org/ConsPolon041221En
Send your thanks: thankyoupoland.info
Read/do more: http://www.noepatents.org/
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list