[postgis-devel] EWKB proposal for OGC

[Paul Selormey]

Unfortunately, the 99-402r2 is not yet available to some of us
the non-OGC members, and therefore commenting on these extensions
may not be right.

I have just these:
1. You have used "misure" in the documents, do you mean "measure"?
2. I wish the presence of the SRID in the geometry WKT is a suffix, since
    it can be considered optional and should not break existing codes:
    "POINT(1 2);SRID=4326"

BTW, any plan to define WTK for triangle, rectangle, circle and other
geometries defined in GML 3.x?

Best regards,
Paul.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <strk at refractions.net>
To: "PostGIS Development Discussion" <postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net>
Cc: "Paul Ramsey" <pramsey at refractions.net>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 9:01 PM
Subject: [postgis-devel] EWKB proposal for OGC


> As suggested by Martin Daly I've made a draft proposal for ZM and
> SRID inclusion in WKB and WKT.
>
> Differently to the Z-Geometry proposal I did not specify semantic
> of the M values, as I don't see any "standardizable" behaviour
> for them. For example, M(isures) could represent temperature
> (linear interpolation meaningful) as well as time (meaningless
> linear interpolation).
>
> Draft attached, comments expected.
>
> --strk;
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>