[postgis-devel] Xing Lin's SoC project (raster support)
Paul Ramsey
pramsey at refractions.net
Wed Jul 11 15:02:05 PDT 2007
Don't get me wrong, if one is going to do a georaster model, copying
Oracle's seems like a pretty safe bet at a technical level, but I have
no idea what the intellectual property issues are around it, do you?
This is not like SFSQL, which came out of a non-patent-encumbered OGC
spec, or the topology work, which follows the draft ISO model.
I would feel safer if we were tied back to a standards body document
rather than the Oracle documentation as our source of model truth.
Question is, does any such thing exist?
P.
Tim Keitt wrote:
> On 7/11/07, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at refractions.net> wrote:
>> I'm a little worried at the quantity of this document that is copied
>> verbatim from the Oracle Georaster documentation. I mean, are we just
>> cribbing their whole design directly? The Oracle model is pretty, but
>> it breaks up the rasters into an internal relational model, which pretty
>> much requires some sort of toolset for people to load/unload data.
>
> Clearly someone at Oracle liked it -- but I'm not married to any
> particular approach. If you have something constructive to add, this
> could be seen as an opportunity to do so.
>
--
Paul Ramsey
Refractions Research
http://www.refractions.net
pramsey at refractions.net
Phone: 250-383-3022
Cell: 250-885-0632
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list