[postgis-devel] Lame attempt at cascade union in sql
Obe, Regina
robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov
Thu Aug 7 12:53:42 PDT 2008
Actually I realized the solution may be much simpler and not require recursion and would be much faster than what I sent you. I'll try that probably and let you know how it goes.
-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Kevin Neufeld
Sent: Thu 8/7/2008 3:46 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Lame attempt at cascade union in sql
Hi Regina,
So, I ran a few tests on a table with ~30000 overlapping polygons.
Test1:
SELECT ST_Union(the_geom) FROM sample_poly;
-- Total runtime: + 2 hours before I cancelled it.
Test2:
SELECT ST_CascadeUnion(the_geom) FROM sample_poly;
-- Total runtime: 19 minutes.
Test3:
SELECT ST_Union(the_geom) AS the_geom
FROM (
SELECT min(id) AS id, ST_Union(the_geom) AS the_geom
FROM (
SELECT min(id) AS id, ST_Union(the_geom) AS the_geom
FROM (
SELECT min(id) AS id, ST_Union(the_geom) AS the_geom
FROM (
SELECT min(id) AS id, ST_Union(the_geom) AS the_geom
FROM sample_poly
GROUP BY round(id/10)
ORDER BY id) AS tmp1
GROUP BY round(id/100)
ORDER BY id) AS tmp2
GROUP BY round(id/1000)
ORDER BY id) AS tmp3
GROUP BY round(id/10000)
ORDER BY id) AS tmp4
GROUP BY round(id/100000);
-- Total runtime: 1.5 minutes
Test4:
Reordered the tuples in sample_poly by "ORDER BY
ST_SnapToGrid(ST_Centroid(the_geom), 0.01);"
Reran query in Test3:
-- Total runtime: 50 secs
So, your function is a definite improvement over ST_Union, but the
timings could still be better.
Cheers,
Kevin
Obe, Regina wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> Can you try the cascade approach I sent in my last email with your large
> dataset.
>
> I tried it with my real data and here are the results
>
> --time 3328 ms, 3203 ms, 3188 ms
> SELECT ST_CascadeUnion(the_geom)
> FROM (SELECT * FROM landparcels
> WHERE pid lIKE '01%' and the_geom is not null
> LIMIT 1000) p
>
> --time 23375 ms, 23594 ms, 24109 ms
> SELECT ST_Union(the_geom)
> FROM (SELECT * FROM landparcels
> WHERE pid lIKE '01%' and the_geom is not null
> LIMIT 1000) p
> -----------------------------------------
> The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
> confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
> pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
> solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20080807/13e33add/attachment.html>
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list