[postgis-devel] CLUSTER in 8.3
Obe, Regina
robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov
Fri Dec 5 09:23:46 PST 2008
Tried from psql to rule that out as an issue and works fine for me still.
So I guess its more than 8.3.5 at play here.
-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Paul Ramsey
Sent: Fri 12/5/2008 12:17 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] CLUSTER in 8.3
Well, psql is autocommitting, and if I do the cluster, then disconnect
and reconnect, the count is still zero. I think I just need to get
the older point releases and walk back and see if it goes away.
P.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Obe, Regina <robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov> wrote:
> On further inspection. If I do this:
>
> drop table ttt;
> create table ttt as select * from all_counties;
> create index ttt_gix on ttt using gist(the_geom);
> cluster ttt using ttt_gix;
>
>
> --Then do this after the above is done
> select count(*) from ttt;
>
> count is 3141
>
> So I think the fact you are doing a count in the same transaction may be
> clobbering it.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Obe, Regina
> Sent: Fri 12/5/2008 1:36 AM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: RE: [postgis-devel] CLUSTER in 8.3
>
> Paul,
>
> Hold on a minute. I was counting the wrong table. Yap I get the same
> behavior, so I guess you are not crazy.
>
> drop table ttt;
> create table ttt as select * from all_counties;
> create index ttt_gix on ttt using gist(the_geom);
> cluster ttt using ttt_gix;
> select count(*) from ttt;
>
> --count is 0
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Fri 12/5/2008 12:42 AM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] CLUSTER in 8.3
>
> And everything works hunky dory with postgis 1.4.0 and pgsql 8.2.11...
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>
> wrote:
>> I just confirmed this happening under PostGIS 1.3.4 also...
>>
>> P
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>
>> wrote:
>>> You clustered ttt then you counted all_counties...
>>>
>>> P
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Obe, Regina <robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I tried your test on my all_counties table and it worked fine. But I
>>>> was
>>>> doing it from pgadmin III. and I have left out that clusture thing you
>>>> were doing. What does that do? :)
>>>>
>>>> create table ttt as select * from all_counties;
>>>> create index ttt_gix on ttt using gist(the_geom);
>>>> cluster ttt using ttt_gix;
>>>> select count(*) from all_counties;
>>>>
>>>> -- gives me 3141 records --
>>>>
>>>> I guess we must have similar county tables since we have the same record
>>>> count.
>>>>
>>>> My projection is in 3395.
>>>>
>>>> running
>>>> "PostgreSQL 8.3.5 on i686-redhat-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC)
>>>> 4.1.2
>>>> 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)"
>>>> "POSTGIS="1.3.4" GEOS="3.0.3-CAPI-1.4.2" PROJ="Rel. 4.5.0, 22 Oct 2006"
>>>> USE_STATS"
>>>>
>>>> Hope that helps,
>>>> Regina
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Paul
>>>> Ramsey
>>>> Sent: Thu 12/4/2008 3:37 PM
>>>> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
>>>> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] CLUSTER in 8.3
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I'm doing something wrong... here's a log of how I exercised this:
>>>>
>>>> pramsey=# create table ttt as select * from counties;
>>>> SELECT
>>>> pramsey=# create index ttt_gix on ttt using gist(the_geom);
>>>> CREATE INDEX
>>>> pramsey=# clusture
>>>> pramsey=# select count(*) from ttt;
>>>> count
>>>> -------
>>>> 3141
>>>> (1 row)
>>>>
>>>> pramsey=# cluster ttt using ttt_gix;
>>>> CLUSTER
>>>> pramsey=# select count(*) from ttt;
>>>> count
>>>> -------
>>>> 0
>>>> (1 row)
>>>>
>>>> pramsey=# select version();
>>>> version
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> PostgreSQL 8.3.5 on i386-apple-darwin9.5.0, compiled by GCC
>>>> i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5465)
>>>> (1 row)
>>>>
>>>> pramsey=# select postgis_full_version();
>>>> postgis_full_version
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> POSTGIS="1.3.4SVN" GEOS="3.1.0-CAPI-1.5.0" PROJ="Rel. 4.6.0, 21 Dec
>>>> 2007" USE_STATS
>>>> (1 row)
>>>>
>>>> pramsey=#
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Kevin Neufeld <kneufeld at refractions.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is seems fine (for Points anyway) on my 8.3.3 install running on an old
>>>>> FC3
>>>>> box.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you run out of disk space? Did the transaction get half way
>>>>> through
>>>>> and
>>>>> was forced to stop?
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Kevin
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it just me, or has clustering on spatial indexes stopped working in
>>>>>> 8.3? First, the syntax of CLUSTER has been changed, from "CLUSTER
>>>>>> [index] ON [table]" to "CLUSTER [table] USING [index]". Second, when I
>>>>>> run the new syntax using a gist index as the target, the index
>>>>>> disappears and all row count drops to zero!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>>>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>>>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
>>>> confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure pursuant
>>>> to
>>>> Massachusetts law. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you
>>>> received
>>>> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from
>>>> any
>>>> computer.
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>>
>>>> Help make the earth a greener place. If at all possible resist printing
>>>> this
>>>> email and join us in saving paper.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
> confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure pursuant to
> Massachusetts law. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
> computer.
>
> ________________________________
>
> Help make the earth a greener place. If at all possible resist printing this
> email and join us in saving paper.
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
-----------------------------------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20081205/d8e7ca70/attachment.html>
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list