[postgis-devel] Docbook ID's and <a name> links

[Obe, Regina]

Kevin,
>Do you mean separating the ST_MakeLine prototypes you just merged
>together or having a second TOC set linking to the same function pages?

>I believe DocBook does allow us to *manually* create an additional TOC
>section that's not automatically generated so we can group methods
>together as we see fit, (like aggregates, geometry returning, boolean
>returning, etc).  Of course, this will again duplicate the function
>names on the main TOC page and will require a higher degree of manual
>intervention.
 
I mean a second TOC listing. I like them being together but since they are such an important
SQL concept, I think they deserve redundancy in the TOC.
 
Well I was hoping that there would be some automagic way to pull out any entry with
 
Geometry set (or should it be geometry set)
 
Hmm - also are we going with upper on Geometry or geometry.  I just realized we have both variants  because the template.xml has upper case, but we've always used lower case.
 
If there is no automagic way - its not that big a deal since we don't add aggregate functions that often.  We can fill that in afterward.
 
Thanks,
Regina




-----------------------------------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20080715/1271ab4f/attachment.html>