[postgis-devel] Port Issues Google => Trac

Paul Ramsey pramsey at opengeo.org
Wed Apr 1 16:09:26 PDT 2009


Thy will be done. Same place, now w/ CDATA.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> Paul,
> If its not too much trouble Cdata tags would be a bit better.  Would save me
> the trouble of trying to well-form it so my XSLT can deal with it.
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
> Ramsey
> Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 5:54 PM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: [postgis-devel] Port Issues Google => Trac
>
> If anyone wants to take a try at porting issues to Trac, the Google data is
> here now:
>
> http://cleverelephant.dyndns.org/~pramsey/postgis-issues.xml
>
> Not well-formed XML, the stuff between description tags isn't escaped, be
> warned. If you want to use a real XML parser on it, let me know and I'll
> generate that stuff inside CDATA blocks.
>
> Howard says the way to do it is to get a blank trac instance running, then
> take that SqlLite database and start inserting into it. Then you can review
> your progress / success by using your trac instance to explore the data.
>
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>



More information about the postgis-devel mailing list