[postgis-devel] Any chance we can get a 1.3.6 RC1 out this week

[Paragon Corporation]

Okay just tried on my OpenSUSE 11 box.  Make check fails on kml check.  It
looks like a rounding error.  I assume that is okay.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paragon
Corporation
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 7:43 PM
To: 'PostGIS Development Discussion'
Subject: RE: [postgis-devel] Any chance we can get a 1.3.6 RC1 out this week

Paul,

Thanks for doing this.
I'll give it a try probably sometime tomorrow or later tonight if I'm up to
it.

Thanks,
Regina 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:11 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Any chance we can get a 1.3.6 RC1 out this week

I've wrapped an 'rc1' and placed it here:

http://postgis.refractions.net/download/postgis-1.3.6rc1.tar.gz

Please test it a bit and then we'll announce to the wider audience.

P

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> I've been testing under Windows 2003 and seems okay - comparing some 
> stress tests between 1.3.5 and 1.3.6 (though was using GEOS 3.1.0 -- 
> still need to test with 3.0.3.
>
> My tests on 8.4 beta 1 under windows I think I'm seeing some 
> discrepancies between ST_Within behavior, but could be my diffing is 
> out of wack  and haven't determined if its an issue with 1.3.6 or 
> 1.4.0.  I had installed both under the same 8.4 beta 1 install in 
> separate more or less identical databases.  Still yet to test on Linux.
>
> It would really help if we have an up to date tar ball for both at the 
> very least.
>
> The Union behavior between the 1.3.6 and 1.4.0 is very different, but 
> I think that is expected and under an OpenJump microscope the results 
> at least have the same number of points and look visually the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel


_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test_40_diff
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 336 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20090421/90fa1d2a/attachment.obj>