[postgis-devel] Any chance we can get a 1.3.6 RC1 out this week
Paragon Corporation
lr at pcorp.us
Wed Apr 22 00:04:35 PDT 2009
Mark,
Actually I will check 1.3.5. I hadn't tested 1.3.5 on this box (or maybe I
did way back when we released and I think it failed one test come to think
of it and I think it might have been the kml), but I did test 1.4.0 on this
box and that passed all tests.
I'm still seeing something weird behavior with the windows 8.4 beta but I
think my versions may be out of synch so I'm going to recompile that. The
problem child seems to be the 1.3.6 (my results between 8.3 and 8.4 (1.3.6)
are not matching with the operators like the = and &&, |&> when it comes to
3D geometries and M geometries. Which probably explains the ST_Within
discrepancy I am seeing.
Thanks,
Regina
-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Mark
Cave-Ayland
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 2:53 AM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Any chance we can get a 1.3.6 RC1 out this week
Paragon Corporation wrote:
> Okay just tried on my OpenSUSE 11 box. Make check fails on kml check.
> It looks like a rounding error. I assume that is okay.
Not really. If 1.3.5 passes all tests on the same box then it should be
considered a regression. It's probably worth giving Olivier a poke, as we
spent some time at the code sprint adding precision specifiers to the
regression tests to remove this problem. I can't remember whether the
changes were done for the 1.3 branch as well as trunk though.
ATB,
Mark.
--
Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect PostgreSQL - PostGIS Sirius
Corporation plc - control through freedom http://www.siriusit.co.uk
t: +44 870 608 0063
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list