[postgis-devel] Any chance we can get a 1.3.6 RC1 out this week
kneufeld at refractions.net
Sun Apr 26 00:13:19 PDT 2009
It passes regression tests on my centos5.3 box, but there are errors in
the log files...
Creating spatial db postgis_reg
TMPDIR is /tmp/pgis_reg_25038
PostgreSQL 8.3.7 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.4.4
20050721 (Red Hat 3.4.4-2)
Postgis 1.3.6RC1 - 2009-04-26 07:03:29
PROJ: Rel. 4.4.9, 29 Oct 2004
Run tests: 40
[kneufeld at turtle regress]$ grep ERROR /tmp/pgis_reg_25038/*
/tmp/pgis_reg_25038/dumper.err:Initializing... ERROR: Cannot determine
spatial reference (empty table or unknown spatial ref).
/tmp/pgis_reg_25038/regress_log:ERROR: table "loadedshp" does not exist
Paul Ramsey wrote:
> I've wrapped an 'rc1' and placed it here:
> Please test it a bit and then we'll announce to the wider audience.
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>> I've been testing under Windows 2003 and seems okay - comparing some stress
>> tests between 1.3.5 and 1.3.6 (though was using GEOS 3.1.0 -- still need to
>> test with 3.0.3.
>> My tests on 8.4 beta 1 under windows I think I'm seeing some discrepancies
>> between ST_Within behavior, but could be my diffing is out of wack and
>> haven't determined if its an issue with 1.3.6 or 1.4.0. I had installed
>> both under the same 8.4 beta 1 install in separate more or less identical
>> databases. Still yet to test on Linux.
>> It would really help if we have an up to date tar ball for both at the very
>> The Union behavior between the 1.3.6 and 1.4.0 is very different, but I
>> think that is expected and under an OpenJump microscope the results at least
>> have the same number of points and look visually the same.
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
More information about the postgis-devel