[postgis-devel] GBT76

[Kevin Neufeld]

It comes up quite often and is indeed a useful thing to have.  If you think you can do it quickly, then I vote +1 to 
have it in 1.4 - though I totally understand and agree with Mark's call for freeze.  Looking at the ST_Dump equivalent, 
it looks like a lot of work though...

-- Kevin

Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Do you like how I referenced a different number in the subject and
> URL? I meant 76.
> 
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at opengeo.org> wrote:
>> This is marked at milestone 1.4
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/postgis/issues/detail?id=76
>>
>> but it's a new feature. I can knock it out, if we want to have it in 1.4.
>>
>> P.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paul Ramsey
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>> Putting the "Po" in "PostGIS".
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel