[postgis-devel] Vote for 1.4 Release

Paul Ramsey pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
Wed Jul 22 14:18:43 PDT 2009


OS/X (PostGIS 1.4 + PgSQL 8.3) is still good.

Run tests: 42
Failed: 0

P

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Paragon Corporation<lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> Kevin,
> Given that these are the kind of errors we were getting on windows earlier,
> I am a little concerned.
>
> Paul -- does it still work for you on Mac OSX.  I can test my other OpenSUSE
> box, which is running Pg 8.3 I think.
>
> Like I said, the OpenSUSE I tested this morning was running 8.2.something,
> but I did have to do an sh autogen.sh (I think I got similar errors before I
> did that).
>
> Looks like you did that though.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Regina
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Neufeld
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:00 PM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Vote for 1.4 Release
>
> K, well, since everyone else can get it working then I must be doing
> something wierd cuz I can't get the regression to actually run.  I can get
> PostGIS installed and working just fine ... I just can't get the regression
> suite to run.
>
> I don't see any issues when using a similar script against the 1.3 branch.
>
> Attached is a script and results I get when trying to run regression against
> an empty 8.2.13 install. (error occurs in line 326 in log file) pg_config is
> not found.
>
> If you're convinced it's just me, then I vote +1 as well.
>
> -- Kevin
>
> Kevin Neufeld wrote:
>> I'm just running regression now.  At first glance, I don't get the
>> same errors as with trunk when running postgis.sql, but I am getting
>> the same make regress errors.
>>
>> Looking a little more into this now.
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>> Paragon Corporation wrote:
>>> Good.  So we are just waiting for Kevin since Mark has already giving
>>> his blessing.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
>>> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of
>>> Paul Ramsey
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:09 PM
>>> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
>>> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Vote for 1.4 Release
>>>
>>> Nope, I vote +1, I'd rather have a release out than not. And the
>>> volume of bug reports will help us determine what stupid regression
>>> mistakes we have left in place and whether they are important.
>>>
>>> P.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Paragon Corporation<lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>>>> Paul,
>>>> No.  We had pushed that to 1.4.1
>>>>
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/222
>>>>
>>>> This is beginning to sound like a
>>>>
>>>> "But, we have waited for so long why don't we put the icing on the
>>>> cake and wait for the GUI to compile under windows?"
>>>>
>>>> If you are thinking that then we should probably have an RC3 and take
>>>> care of the upgrade issue I mentioned here
>>>>
>>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/223
>>>>
>>>> I'm pretty sure our upgrade script is missing the box3d_extents
>>>> autocasts.
>>>> I also feel we should make the box3d_extent --> box2d CAST explicit
>>>> instead of implicit.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that is the CAST that is causing me problems when I restore
>>>> a 1.3 db unto  a fresh 1.4 db and I question its value since I think
>>>> most of our functions Have casts for box3d.  That I haven't tested
>>>> though.
>>>>
>>>>  Thanks,
>>>> Regina
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
>>>> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of
>>>> Paul Ramsey
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:01 PM
>>>> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
>>>> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Vote for 1.4 Release
>>>>
>>>> Does the GUI build?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Paragon Corporation<lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>>>>>  We have successfully make checked under windows for 8.2,8.3,8.4
>>>>>
>>>>>  Can we have a 1.4 release
>>>>>
>>>>>  +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Regina
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>



More information about the postgis-devel mailing list