[postgis-devel] Documenting new ST_Buffer

[Paragon Corporation]

Please don't.  Are we sure we want this deprecated?

I for one prefer writing 

ST_Buffer(geom,4,48)

Vs.

ST_Buffer(geom,4,'quad_segment=48')

I guess I'm just a creature of habit though I don't see the benefit of
deprecating this since we are already reduced down to one C API for all of
them.  

Thanks,
Regina

 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of strk
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 8:55 AM
To: postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
Subject: [postgis-devel] Documenting new ST_Buffer

I'm in the process of writing documentation for the new ST_Buffer signature.
Should I drop references to the ST_Buffer(geom, float, int) or just add note
about it being deprecated and supported only for backward compatibility ?

--strk;

 Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer      ()  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 http://foo.keybit.net/~strk/services.html  /\  Keep it simple! 
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel