[postgis-devel] WKT Raster: Bug tracking

[Obe, Regina]

Pierre,

>From what I recall.  

I think 

"once upon a time PostGIS used trac.  Then
trac broke."

Someone said "lets get together a stop gap bug tracker till 
we get trac working again.  there is google lets use it.  Easy to setup." -- 

Then we all forgot about trac.

My memory could be wrong, but I think that's how it happened.


-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net on behalf of Pierre Racine
Sent: Fri 3/6/2009 2:20 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: RE: [postgis-devel] WKT Raster: Bug tracking
 
I would not go with trac unless:

1) We know why PostGIS folks did not choose it. They must have a good reason. Anyone knows?

2) They actually plan to move to trac

If they accept WKT Raster in their Google code account, then maybe we can all move together some day. So there is no risk that we stay alone in our own system. I don't want to be alone :-(

I just wait for god benediction. But who's god?

Pierre

>-----Original Message-----
>From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net [mailto:postgis-devel-
>bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
>Sent: 6 mars 2009 12:03
>To: PostGIS Development Discussion
>Subject: RE: [postgis-devel] WKT Raster: Bug tracking
>
>Obe, Regina wrote:
>> > Perhaps there is one, personally I've found it very helpful to be
>> > able to link
>> > from bug reports directly to source code revision/file/line easily,
>> > as it is possible in Trac (i.e. see http://trac.osgeo.org/geos/).
>> > Google Code lacks of such feature, so it requires more writing &
>> > time to deal with bugs.
>>
>> Good point.  At anyrate I would like to see both projects tracked
>> together  so if we eventually move back to trac for tracking, then both
>> should be moved at the same time.
>>
>> Or I suppose since WKTRaster is smaller at this point, it could start
>> off in trac and then we merge the core PostGIS into that trac.
>
>Good point.
>
>Best regards,
>--
>Mateusz Loskot
>Senior Programmer, Cadcorp
>http://www.cadcorp.com
>
>
>
>
>For the sake of simplicity, perhaps Frank's preference will make life easier.



-----------------------------------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20090306/d533fb39/attachment.html>