[postgis-devel] 1.5.2 release ticket status - 2010-09-18

[Paragon Corporation]

+1 for release 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Ramsey
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2010 3:40 PM
To: Mark Cave-Ayland
Cc: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] 1.5.2 release ticket status - 2010-09-18

On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayland at siriusit.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [CC to Olivier]
>
> After some hacking today, here is where I think we are with a 1.5.2
release:
>
>
> **NEW BLOCKER**
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/532 [PR]
>
> - The trunk commit is sensible based upon the ticket contents, but the 
> 1.5 commit looks totally wrong (it looks like the original version). I 
> think it is just a case of removing and reapplying something similar 
> to trunk, but I'd like a second opinion from Paul.

Re-applied. I'm happy with it.

>
> **UNSURE**
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/522
>
> - I can't recreate this, but we should fix before a 1.5.2 release if 
> it is a genuine bug. Maybe the newer version of shapelib fixes this 
> which is why I don't see it in SVN?

I think you mis-referenced the ticket number, but you mean the double-linked
glibc failure. And yes, it's not in SVN, but it shows in 1.5.1, so I can
only assume the shapelib update caught it.

>
>
> Existing outstanding tickets:
>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/522 [PR]
>
> I believe this is now not a bug, more that various other getopt() 
> implementations have being clever things with out-of-order arguments. 
> Just waiting for Regina to confirm, but I'm fairly sure this is FIXED.
>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/543 [MCA]
>
> This is starting to get quite hairy. I have some ideas, but they 
> aren't going to be particularly quick to implement. I'd like to punt this
to 1.5.3.
>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/572 [OC]
>
> Olivier, can you fix this before the end of the weekend? If not, I 
> think this is something I can do tomorrow.
>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/513 [PR]
>
> This is FIXED, although there seems to still be an issue with 
> selection filters. Let's punt to 1.5.3.
>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/527 [MCA]
>
> FIXED.

I am ready to run a release now, just say the word.



>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.
>
> --
> Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect PostgreSQL - PostGIS 
> Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom 
> http://www.siriusit.co.uk
> t: +44 870 608 0063
>
> Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs
>
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel