[postgis-devel] [PostGIS] #1148: Geocoder has poor results with correct inputs
PostGIS
trac at osgeo.org
Sat Aug 6 15:09:26 PDT 2011
#1148: Geocoder has poor results with correct inputs
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: darkblueb | Owner: robe
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: medium | Milestone: PostGIS 2.0.0
Component: tiger geocoder | Version: trunk
Keywords: |
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Changes (by darkblueb):
* priority: high => medium
Comment:
I have written a new tool - alameda_tiger_peek.py; after the
alameda_geocode.py pass ( which records detailed information on all stages
of the geocoder ) this next tool operates on its output.
Loop over the output of the geocoder and work on elements which : the
input address starts with a number, the manhatten distance of the result
POINT and the expected input POINT is greater than a threshold (0.01 now);
from those, gather the UNIQUE street names from the input addresses (sum
of the street name components 1-4 in norm_addy)
Loop over the output of the geocoder again.. if the input address is on
a street identified above, "peek" at the TIGER edges JOIN featurenames
that are within a small buffer of the POINT of the expected geocode
result, spit out those "peeks" to a csv, and remove that street name from
the list of street names.
The purpose of this is to help identify all cases where the geocoder
performance is poor due to lack of information in TIGER, versus where the
geocoder is actually failing in some way.. As noted previously, there
could be a problem with the way the geocoder is loading data from TIGER
that is not yet found..
Bug Priority changed to medium, because some issues have been addressed.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/1148#comment:17>
PostGIS <http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/>
The PostGIS Trac is used for bug, enhancement & task tracking, a user and developer wiki, and a view into the subversion code repository of PostGIS project.
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list