[postgis-devel] Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: PostGIS-trunk-regression #1772

[Chris Hodgson]

Hmm, actually, looking at the build artifacts, it seems like the tickets 
test is failing:

http://office.refractions.net:1500/job/PostGIS-trunk-regression/1772/artifact/results_9.0.1_3.2.2_4.7.0/regress-TRUNK_8497_9.0.1_3.2.2_4.7.0.log

Here is the output from the tickets diff:

--- tickets_expected    2011-12-20 10:51:54.000000000 -0800
+++ 
/var/home/buildbot/opt/hudson/jobs/PostGIS-trunk-regression/workspace/results_9.0.1_3.2.2_4.7.0/test_62_out 
2011-12-21 13:59:24.000000000 -0800
@@ -141,5 +141,5 @@
  #1320.geog.3|MULTIPOLYGON|4326
  #1320.geom.3|MULTIPOLYGON|4326
</#1320>
-#1344|\001\002\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000
+#1344|\x01020000000100000000000000000000000000000000000000
  #1385|

Note this is trunk postgis on postgres 9.0.1 with geos 3.2.2 and proj 4.7

Chris

On 11-12-21 02:37 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 02:20:13PM -0800, Chris Hodgson wrote:
>> Anyone know what the file "test_62_out" is? Something is outputting
>> it from the regression tests and then the hudson buildbot script
>> greps all the output files for "error" and finds it in the file,
>> thus declaring the build failed, for every build in a little while
>> now (perhaps the last week?)
> Expecting an ERROR is not a failure (if the ERROR is obtained).
> The only real failure is when "make check" returns non-zero.
>
> I guess we could give better names to log files, anyway.
>
> --strk;
>
>    ,------o-.
>    |   __/  |    Thank you for PostGIS-2.0 Topology !
>    |  / 2.0 |    http://www.pledgebank.com/postgistopology
>    `-o------'
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel