[postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on

[Pierre Racine]

Could you briefly describe this change and how you think it should impact raster?

Thanks,

Pierre

> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net [mailto:postgis-devel-
> bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paragon Corporation
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:30 PM
> To: 'PostGIS Development Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on
> 
> If raster folks and strk are okay with it, I'm okay with it.
> 
> So a reserved +1
> 
>  Regina
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
> Ramsey
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:19 PM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: [postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on
> 
> I'd like to turn on the flag on the weekend and start cleaning up bugs next week.
> FYI, this will probably harm topology and raster more than anyone else. What
> will happen is I'll turn on the flag and alter the
> 4-5 regression tests (things like memsize and a couple minor representation
> changes) that don't pass with the flag. Then I'll kill big bugs during the week and
> work through tickets. In succeeding weeks once things are calmed down I will
> change things that are currently #defined (the BOX2FLOAT4 -> GBOX transition)
> into the "real thing" and remove some code we don't need anymore (old WKT
> parser).
> 
> P.
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel