[postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on

[Sandro Santilli]

I'm fine with it.
I won't be there taking topology back up for a couple of weeks though.
But I assume any issue would be minor in there, as topology is pure scripting.

--strk;

Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
http://strk.keybit.net/services.html

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Paragon Corporation <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
> If raster folks and strk are okay with it, I'm okay with it.
>
> So a reserved +1
>
>  Regina
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul
> Ramsey
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:19 PM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: [postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on
>
> I'd like to turn on the flag on the weekend and start cleaning up bugs next
> week. FYI, this will probably harm topology and raster more than anyone
> else. What will happen is I'll turn on the flag and alter the
> 4-5 regression tests (things like memsize and a couple minor representation
> changes) that don't pass with the flag. Then I'll kill big bugs during the
> week and work through tickets. In succeeding weeks once things are calmed
> down I will change things that are currently #defined (the BOX2FLOAT4 ->
> GBOX transition) into the "real thing" and remove some code we don't need
> anymore (old WKT parser).
>
> P.