[postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on

[Paragon Corporation]

Pierre,

We need it to get nd indexes.  So it will be a bit of a pain while Paul is
doing his surgery, but once in place

Our raster support, 3d spatial index support for our 3d functions (right now
3D functions as using a 2D index)
, etc will be pretty much in place and then hopefully we can move on to real
beta testing.

 Thanks,
Regina

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Pierre
Racine
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:32 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on

Could you briefly describe this change and how you think it should impact
raster?

Thanks,

Pierre

> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net 
> [mailto:postgis-devel- bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of 
> Paragon Corporation
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:30 PM
> To: 'PostGIS Development Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on
> 
> If raster folks and strk are okay with it, I'm okay with it.
> 
> So a reserved +1
> 
>  Regina
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of 
> Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:19 PM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: [postgis-devel] Turning GSERIALIZED on
> 
> I'd like to turn on the flag on the weekend and start cleaning up bugs
next week.
> FYI, this will probably harm topology and raster more than anyone 
> else. What will happen is I'll turn on the flag and alter the
> 4-5 regression tests (things like memsize and a couple minor 
> representation
> changes) that don't pass with the flag. Then I'll kill big bugs during 
> the week and work through tickets. In succeeding weeks once things are 
> calmed down I will change things that are currently #defined (the 
> BOX2FLOAT4 -> GBOX transition) into the "real thing" and remove some 
> code we don't need anymore (old WKT parser).
> 
> P.
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel