[postgis-devel] 1.5.3?

Paul Ramsey pramsey at opengeo.org
Tue May 24 10:15:19 PDT 2011


It's not clear to me any/many people are pushing through Inf
geometries. So we have

1 - throw ERROR or
2 - return NULL/Empty geometry

I'll throw my vote in for option 1.

P

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayland at siriusit.co.uk> wrote:
> On 24/05/11 17:20, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
>> Well, I'm going to apply his Inf-blocking patch, and I'll carry the
>> issue over to Proj.4 land.
>> P.
>
> I think we need a bit more discussion on what the behaviour should be before
> applying though. At the moment I don't have a feel for what the standard
> behaviour in this scenario should be (especially with respect to existing
> tools) - should we throw an ERROR and abort the transaction? Return an
> empty/NULL geometry and emit a WARNING?
>
>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.
>
> --
> Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
> PostgreSQL - PostGIS
> Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
> http://www.siriusit.co.uk
> t: +44 870 608 0063
>
> Sirius Labs: http://www.siriusit.co.uk/labs
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>



More information about the postgis-devel mailing list