[postgis-devel] SummaryStats

[Paul Ramsey]

No, I'm referring to my example below... where the numbers have little
labels on them in the canonical output. Some kind of key/value
structure. Far more human-friendly.
Pierre's trick works to get something pretty but the canonical form
can be human readable so why not make it so.

P.

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:56 PM, dustymugs <dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/06/2012 01:46 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>
>> Raster seems to be full of these composite types, which are nice
>> enough for returning stuff, but I have a problem with the canonical
>> forms. Why is SummaryStats so anonymous?
>>
>> (65364,210241.004791319,3.21646479394345,,0,38.9035530090332)
>>
>> Why not something with tags so I can see what these things are?
>>
>> [sum=65364, min=210241.004791319, max=, etc]
>>
>> Could even go the JSON route.
>>
>
> Paul,
>
> When you say tagged, are you talking about something like the output of
> PostGIS_Full_version()?
>
> -bborie
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel