[postgis-devel] SummaryStats

[Pierre Racine]

Then you have to parse to reuse?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net [mailto:postgis-devel-
> bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 5:03 PM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] SummaryStats
> 
> No, I'm referring to my example below... where the numbers have little labels on
> them in the canonical output. Some kind of key/value structure. Far more
> human-friendly.
> Pierre's trick works to get something pretty but the canonical form can be
> human readable so why not make it so.
> 
> P.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:56 PM, dustymugs <dustymugs at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 03/06/2012 01:46 PM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> >>
> >> Raster seems to be full of these composite types, which are nice
> >> enough for returning stuff, but I have a problem with the canonical
> >> forms. Why is SummaryStats so anonymous?
> >>
> >> (65364,210241.004791319,3.21646479394345,,0,38.9035530090332)
> >>
> >> Why not something with tags so I can see what these things are?
> >>
> >> [sum=65364, min=210241.004791319, max=, etc]
> >>
> >> Could even go the JSON route.
> >>
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > When you say tagged, are you talking about something like the output
> > of PostGIS_Full_version()?
> >
> > -bborie
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > postgis-devel mailing list
> > postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> > http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel