[postgis-devel] Branch 2.0
Paul Ramsey
pramsey at opengeo.org
Sun May 20 00:32:25 PDT 2012
Revisiting this. Sandro you're the only naysayer... can I branch?
Or, alternately, can I release 2.0.1 based on the current trunk and then branch?
P.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at opengeo.org> wrote:
> It could be quite a long time until we get to 2.0.1
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/report/22
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:58:50PM +0200, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>>> We discussed it at the sprint, but before I do it, any vetos on
>>> starting the 2.0 branch, so that 2.1 items can be committed to trunk?
>>
>> I'd feel better if we could branch right after 2.0.1 is out.
>> There shouldn't be much tickets left for that. My impression
>> is it would only take geos-3.3.4 to go with pgis 2.0.1.
>>
>> You can always create git branches for features, will be easy
>> to merge them back into SVN when it's time :)
>>
>> --strk;
>>
>> ,------o-.
>> | __/ | Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
>> | / 2.0 | http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
>> `-o------'
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list