[postgis-devel] Branch 2.0

[Paragon Corporation]

-1 on releasing 2.0.1 unless GEOS 3.3.4 follows soon after or before. 

Thanks,
Regina

> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net 
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On 
> Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 3:32 AM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Branch 2.0
> 
> Revisiting this. Sandro you're the only naysayer... can I branch?
> Or, alternately, can I release 2.0.1 based on the current 
> trunk and then branch?
> P.
> 
> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Paul Ramsey 
> <pramsey at opengeo.org> wrote:
> > It could be quite a long time until we get to 2.0.1
> >
> > http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/report/22
> >
> > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Sandro Santilli 
> <strk at keybit.net> wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:58:50PM +0200, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> >>> We discussed it at the sprint, but before I do it, any vetos on 
> >>> starting the 2.0 branch, so that 2.1 items can be 
> committed to trunk?
> >>
> >> I'd feel better if we could branch right after 2.0.1 is out.
> >> There shouldn't be much tickets left for that. My impression is it 
> >> would only take geos-3.3.4 to go with pgis 2.0.1.
> >>
> >> You can always create git branches for features, will be easy to 
> >> merge them back into SVN when it's time :)
> >>
> >> --strk;
> >>
> >>  ,------o-.
> >>  |   __/  |    Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
> >>  |  / 2.0 |    http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
> >>  `-o------'
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> postgis-devel mailing list
> >> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> >> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>