[postgis-devel] Minimum version of GDAL for PostGIS 2.1

[Jorge Arevalo]

+1 too

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at opengeo.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland
> <mark.cave-ayland at ilande.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 24/05/12 22:09, dustymugs wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> Now that PostGIS-trunk is targeting 2.1, I'd like to start a
>>> discussion for setting a new minimum version of GDAL required
>>> for PostGIS.
>>> Supporting 1.6 is a pain and the last release was in November
>>> 2009.  The ideal would be 1.9 due to GDALFPolygonize and
>>> various other improvements regarding burning geometries to rasters.
>>>
>>> Personally, I'd like to up the minimum to 1.8.  Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Since you know a lot more about raster than I do, I'm happy with this as
>> long as we update the documentation so things are clear, and as per my
>> previous email we force configure to fail with a clear error message if the
>> libraries are not recent enough.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>>
>> ATB,
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel



-- 
Jorge Arevalo
http://www.libregis.org