[postgis-devel] Minimum version of GDAL for PostGIS 2.1

[dustymugs]

+1 for me.  Somehow I didn't vote.

With 7 yes votes and 0 votes of any other kind, I'll commit the code
later making the minimum version of GDAL be 1.8 for PostGIS 2.1.

-bborie

On 05/28/2012 12:08 AM, Jorge Arevalo wrote:
> +1 too
> 
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Paul Ramsey <pramsey at opengeo.org> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland
>> <mark.cave-ayland at ilande.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 24/05/12 22:09, dustymugs wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that PostGIS-trunk is targeting 2.1, I'd like to start a
>>>> discussion for setting a new minimum version of GDAL required
>>>> for PostGIS.
>>>> Supporting 1.6 is a pain and the last release was in November
>>>> 2009.  The ideal would be 1.9 due to GDALFPolygonize and
>>>> various other improvements regarding burning geometries to rasters.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I'd like to up the minimum to 1.8.  Thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> Since you know a lot more about raster than I do, I'm happy with this as
>>> long as we update the documentation so things are clear, and as per my
>>> previous email we force configure to fail with a clear error message if the
>>> libraries are not recent enough.
>>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>>
>>> ATB,
>>>
>>> Mark.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> postgis-devel mailing list
>>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> postgis-devel mailing list
>> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> 
> 
>