lr at pcorp.us
Fri Nov 16 14:19:07 PST 2012
Oh yah. Hmm did I forget to set that up. I guess she's just building the
binaries but not testing them.
I've ticketed so I don't forget and will tackle this weekend.
I don't think Debbie bothers testing 2.0 except on 9.0 so probably should
add the others to the list at some point for her too.
From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of dustymugs
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 3:22 PM
To: postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] 2.0.2
Heh. Any way for winnie to do 2.0 regression tests?
On 11/16/2012 12:18 PM, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> -1 (can we wait a week)
> Given that there are so many tickets still open under 2.0.2, I'd feel
> better if we moved them to 2.1.0 or 2.0.3 first Or decide we need to
> fix before release.
> Cough cough :) I'd also feel better if we had an RC this time. It's
> hard for me to take anything seriously (that has been sitting for 5
> months) that doesn't have an Rc.
> Also I haven't looked at 2.0 in a while so concerned that some changes
> aren't so minor that I wouldn't want to do a couple regress checks
> before we mark it golden. E.g. making sure the extension upgrade
> plumbing actually works going from 2.0.1 to 2.0.2
> On 11/16/2012 10:27 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> We're 5 months out from 2.0.1 and have quite a long list of fixes in
>> place now... calling for 2.0.2?
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the postgis-devel