[postgis-devel] [PostGIS] #2122: [raster] Real extent feature lost after metadata as views
mateusz at loskot.net
Fri Nov 30 07:39:43 PST 2012
On 30 November 2012 15:35, Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:51:26PM +0000, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 30 November 2012 14:22, Sandro Santilli <strk at keybit.net> wrote:
>> > All of this seems to me as something that should be dealt with
>> > in upper levels, not value level.
>> What is the upper level?
> Whoever is having problems with the extent now being larger than expected.
> Is that the issue, right ?
The problem is a feature has changed, implicitly, and is causing issues.
The call is to fix the feature to its previous behaviour.
> I see the extent in raster_columns is returned by:
> _raster_constraint_info_extent(n.nspname, c.relname, a.attname) AS extent
> Could that function figure if it's a "regular blocking" table by looking
> at other constraints and encode padding in those constraints ?
Perhaps, but how to distinguish if the padding has been added at loading
or it is not really a padding but NODATA strips present in the source raster.
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
More information about the postgis-devel