[postgis-devel] Subject=Re: Updates to address standardizer

[Mitchell Gibbs]

Wow. That did the trick. That was both simple and complex. Thanks very much.

I will look into resources you pointed me to. Really powerful stuff.

Thanks again,

Mitch


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com
> wrote:

> On 8/1/2013 9:45 AM, Mitchell Gibbs wrote:
>
>> Thanks very much for all of your work on integrating the PAGC address
>> parser into PostGIS. I'm new to PostGIS and was getting frustrated with
>> the old address parser. The PAGC standardizer took some time to figure
>> out but now that's I've got it working the quality of the results is
>> much better and the performance is a huge boost.
>>
>> I am finding a situation that is confounding the current version and I
>> wondered if there might be a simple solution.
>>
>> If an apartment has a designation like "1SW", the standardizer returns
>> nothing. (e.g. "12345 S EVANS RD APT 1SW, OAK PARK, IL 60453"). Changing
>> the unit designation to 1S or 1W works fine.
>>
>> Any advice?
>>
>
> You can add the following rule to the rules table:
>
> insert rules set rule='16 0 22 -1 16 17 17 -1 4 7';
>
> This parses:
>
> APT 1 SW as:
>
> UNITH NUMBER DIRECT -> UNITH UNITT UNITT
>   16    0     22    -1   16    17    17  -1 EXTRA RANK(7)
>
> You wil have to read more about the rules in pagclib and the pagc docs.
> You can also use pagc_stand to get some diagnostic output on how the
> standardizer works.
>
> -Steve
> ______________________________**_________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-**devel<http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/postgis-devel/attachments/20130801/ea18c081/attachment.html>