[postgis-devel] PostGIS 3D - Points to be discussed

[Sandro Santilli]

On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:58:29PM +0100, Oliver Courtin wrote:

> And even if it's not in your initial question, we don't have the feeling
> that CGAL could be (in a near future) a way to not use GEOS anymore,
> we are more thinking AND than OR...

The SFCGAL name seemed to be that ambitious ..
If we go AND we'll need duplicated handling of
things like precision control and conversion functions.

It'd be nice to have less dependencies, generally.

--strk;