[postgis-devel] PostGIS 3D - Points to be discussed

Sandro Santilli strk at keybit.net
Fri Feb 1 08:19:29 PST 2013


On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:58:29PM +0100, Oliver Courtin wrote:

> And even if it's not in your initial question, we don't have the feeling
> that CGAL could be (in a near future) a way to not use GEOS anymore,
> we are more thinking AND than OR...

The SFCGAL name seemed to be that ambitious ..
If we go AND we'll need duplicated handling of
things like precision control and conversion functions.

It'd be nice to have less dependencies, generally.

--strk;



More information about the postgis-devel mailing list