[postgis-devel] Separating spatial_ref_sys from installed and user
Paragon Corporation
lr at pcorp.us
Sat Jun 8 20:12:21 PDT 2013
Better not sure, but you can look at what I have to tackle this issue. Look
at the one I use to build the extension exclusion.
In extensions/compute_srid_contiguous_ranges.sql (which generates the ugly
filter you see in
Extensions/postgis/sql_bits/mark_editable_objects.sql.in)
Which inspired this article:
http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/archives/255-Finding-contiguous-primar
y-keys.html
Someone showed me a more elegant way on the related reddit thread:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Database/comments/uss09/finding_contiguous_primary_k
eys/?already_submitted=true
Though unfortunately it seems we have quite a few gaps people can sneak
srids into.
So ideal would be of course if we can flag.
Thanks,
Regina
-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Bborie Park
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 8:29 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: [postgis-devel] Separating spatial_ref_sys from installed and user
I'm trying to distract myself from writing so I'm working on creating a
partitioned spatial_ref_sys (ticket #1831).
I've got an implementation working but have an issue with filtering an
existing spatial_ref_sys table into PostGIS-provided vs user-provided piles.
Currently, I'm using a crude SRID filter.
PostGIS: (srid <= 32776 AND auth_name = 'EPSG') or srid = 900913
user-provided: srid > 900913
Is there a better solution to filtering PostGIS-provided srids?
-bborie
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list