[postgis-devel] VOTE: Drop GEOS 3.3 support at PostGIS 2.2

Paragon Corporation lr at pcorp.us
Mon Jun 10 02:22:56 PDT 2013


So is that a -1?
Why aren't you worried about stable releases of PostGIS  which are way
behind on debian? 

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Sandro Santilli
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 5:10 AM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] VOTE: Drop GEOS 3.3 support at PostGIS 2.2

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:06:18AM -0400, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> I would imagine 6 months from now at earliest at rate we go perhaps 
> even longer.

I think we should keep support for deps which are packaged with a debian
stable release. This is unlikely to happen in 6 months.

--strk;

> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Sandro 
> Santilli
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 4:33 AM
> To: PostGIS Development Discussion
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] VOTE: Drop GEOS 3.3 support at PostGIS 
> 2.2
> 
> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 11:53:45PM -0400, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> > Yes definitely.  I personally think we should require at least 3.4.0 
> > for 2.2
> > 
> > The list of stuff that will be left out for 3.3 users is already too 
> > silly for me at 2.1  and will be even sillier in 2.2 especially if 
> > we get the voroni stuff in place currently being worked on by Gsoc 
> > student.
> > 
> > 2.2 to take full advantage would require geos 3.5 actually unless 
> > the voroni stuff is put in before 3.4 goes out the door.
> > 
> > Strk in particular -- your thoughts
> 
> GEOS 3.4 isn't planned to be released before after this summer.
> When do you want PostGIS 2.2 to roll ?
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel





More information about the postgis-devel mailing list