[postgis-devel] 2.1.2

[Paul Ramsey]

No, the parts that are current explicitly v3 cannot be interpreted as v2, so it's not any version. We should finish off the change to make the licensing *consistent* across the code we have control of. 

P. 

-- 
Paul Ramsey
http://cleverelephant.ca
http://postgis.net


On Saturday, October 26, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:12:32PM -0400, Paragon Corporation wrote:
> > -1
> > 
> > 
> > 1) We haven't even released a 2.1.1 :)
> > 2) I'd rather wait till we fix the raster licensing issue since it affects
> > package maintainers. 
> 
> 
> 
> Speaking of which, I just realized there's no license conflict as
> PostGIS is already, effectively, "GPL any version".
> See http://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/2515#comment:7
> 
> Of course number 1 is a perfect reason not to release 2.1.2 :)
> 
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org (mailto:postgis-devel at lists.osgeo.org)
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel