[postgis-devel] 2.1.2

[Sandro Santilli]

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:14:56AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> No, the parts that are current explicitly v3 cannot be interpreted as v2, so it's not any version. We should finish off the change to make the licensing *consistent* across the code we have control of. 

Yep, I was referring to "postgis core".
You're right there's an inconsistency, but there will still be an inconsistency
until we also switch "PostGIS Core" (and liblwgeom) to GPLv2+, or raster
could not be interpreted as v1, so wouldn't be "any version" like core.

--strk;